"... gold will be a bit late to the party" .... All the time that I have been following you (2 years) and going to the Metals Investor Forum, gold has been about to rocket off into the cosmos. Then last September gold has gone sideways; and now "...gold will be a bit late to the party".
Not happy. Please explain.
In the last 2.5 years gold has done this:
Gold miners as a whole have done this, using the GDX as a proxy:
There really is no good proxy for junior gold explorers. The TSX Venture Composite Index used to be a reasonable representation but now, with virtual currencies and pot stocks and other tech items, it really isn’t any more. So I can’t show what juniors have done. I would say they’ve followed a similar pattern, albeit with smaller gains (explorers don’t enjoy the same leverage to a rising metal price as miners enjoy because they don’t actually produce, or often even have in the ground, any gold) and a lot more volatility stemming from results.
So my first response is that gold has done darn well.
My second response is that I do not ever see gold going like a rocket into the cosmos, and as such I certainly don’t say so. Others who take the stage at the Metals Investor Forum (MIF) perhaps do. I am not a gold bug. I don’t believe fiat currencies are going to explode; I don’t think all the mega money printing the central banks around the world are going will send gold to the moon. I don’t even own any physical, aside from a few pieces of jewelry.
I think history is being made as governments and central banks abandon long-held ideas (like that debts should ever be repaid) in favour of Modern Monetary Theory. And I don’t know how it will all play out. No one 3 does. And because of that, I think gold – a long standing safe haven of value – will play an important role in the coming years.
I try to convey the twists and turns in that process in my editorials. I try to caution when I see near term risk. I try to encourage when I see opportunity. I act on those forecasts myself (and my portfolio has multiplied threefold since I started The Maven Letter in 2015, for what it’s worth).
Don’t get me wrong: I share your frustration. I started a business based on the idea that metals would turn from bear to bull – and that was six years ago! As the charts above show, the premise has been correct, even if the scale of success has left all of us wanting more.
I want the gold market to take off tomorrow and not turn back. But I am a realist. Even well-established bull markets don’t simply go straight up. And gold is a complicated beast, its performance impacted by growth and inflation and confidence and the all-important bond market. So I watch those things and try to understand how they might influence gold in the near and medium term.
Last fall I swallowed my pride and sold a set of stocks I had entered in August because I realized that I’d let gold’s rapid rise from June to August get me overexcited. In that excitement, I let down my guard, letting myself neglect that even fully established gold bull markets take a step back for every two or three steps forward, whether because of macroeconomic shifts or straight seasonality. When gold started coming off its peak, I remembered. I sold at a loss (about 30% on average, if memory serves) and commented that I should have kept a more level head.
Since then, the gold market has been aggravating. Believe me, I know – I focus on it every day. But I still believe the fundamentals are in place for it to work well in the medium term. And because I hold that outlook, I have to try to predict the near term as well, because it’s whether we are at an interim peak or valley that helps determine when to move on opportunities.
It would be a heck of a lot easier to just stick with my medium-term confidence and say, always, that gold is about to go. But that would not be true or helpful.
So. I’m sorry for getting overexcited last August. I very much understand the frustration in having to wait, more, for the gangbuster gold bull market that we all want. But I am not sorry for conveying how and why my near-term outlook shifts, within a bullish medium-term perspective.
And finally: I know that gains got last year feel pretty distant. But they happened. We did well.
And we will again.
In her letter, Resource Maven explains what she is buying and selling, and why. Maven has bought into several of the markets best - performing stocks well ahead of the curve. She regularly identifies exciting new exploration opportunities and manages the inherent risk by selling some into speculative gains. And the mine builder and operator stocks that form the basis of the portfolio give strong, ongoing leverage to the rising prices of gold and silver. She has your precious metal bases covered.
Hi Gwen: I was going to write a couple of days ago because I had not received anything regarding my subscription, so was happy to receive this yesterday.
I guess it was sometime in 2017 when I first subscribed to the Maven Letter because I was very disappointed with where my _____ newsletter subscriptions were going. I have been very pleased with both the style and contents of the letter, it reflects my interest in the junior market. I was really pleased with your excellent piece in the last issue regarding PP's and "free trade dates". But, more than anything I thank you for the Premium Service. It is a service that is excellent. In the past year we have had a number of issues that have soared and others that have been just great. There has only been one that disappointed, but even on that one I managed to almost break even and still have the warrants. Many thanks for a job well done.
"Gwen - I just analyzed our returns for the past month. We had a 36.7% return on our portfolio in one month! Thank you so much for your excellent, thoughtful and timely guidance. 12 of the 18 stocks in my portfolio were recommended by you. 4 were recommended by other MIF letter writers and 1 each by Eric Sprott and Rick Rule. Yes it was a good month for precious metals - Gold was up $50 and Silver $3.90 - but “our" portfolio performance more than doubled the 16% of the GDXJ"