Resource Maven

Free Articles

Uranium: A Potential Political Trade

It’s been days since President Trump sent missiles into Syria, targeting chemical weapons facilities. We still have no idea how successful that effort was; the US claims almost every one of its 100 missiles hit its intended target while Syrian ally Russia says Syrian defenses shot down 71 of them.

At this point, it looks like the risk of a real war between the world’s two largest militaries has eased. However, the confrontation is far from over.

For now, focus has just shifted to financial attacks. The US moved first, implementing a suite of new sanctions. Russia responded by introducing legislation that it could use to tighten or even cease uranium trade with the US.

A draft law now before the Russian National Parliament (the Duma) calls for stopping international cooperation in the aircraft and nuclear industries, not only with the US but also with other foreign states that support US sanctions against Russia or support Washington’s position on Syria.

If this law passes, it could create a serious uranium supply shock. The US relies on nuclear reactors for about 20% of its electricity. Only 4% of the uranium feeding those reactors is produced domestically; the rest is imported and almost half comes from Russia, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan.

In other words, America is highly reliant on Russia and Russian proxy nations for its baseload uranium requirements. The US relies on Russia alone for between 13 and 16% of its uranium needs.

That’s why this law will make front-page news if approved by the Duma. If that happens, investors will scramble to get uranium exposure.

Those who follow the sector are already playing this opportunity. Just look at the share price of key uranium sector player Cameco:
Is this a trade to jump on?

Depends on your appetite for political risk. Russia hasn’t actually banned uranium trade with America yet. If it does, the uranium price will spike. I think the spike would be big enough to be worth trading but I wouldn’t assume it would kickstart a new uranium bull market, so buying on this opportunity means being ready to sell pretty much as soon as it happens, if it happens. Certainly a good number of naysayers think it’s all a pressure tactic and that Russian uranium supplies are just fine.

For context: 15% of US uranium requirements is about 7 million lbs. per annum. In the last two years we’ve seen far more supply come offline than that – not just shift destinations, but come offline – as Cameco, Kazatomprom, and Areva put production, and yet uranium pricing has remained pretty stagnant. That’s why I’m not convinced this move, if it happened, would kickstart a uranium bull market.

Uranium will yet have its day. Demand will outstrip supply in the medium term and prices are nowhere near high enough to incentivize new mine builds. If Russian and America get into a real spat, Putin could pressure Kazakhstan to suspend its uranium trade with America, which is larger than Russia’s. Escalation of that nature would probably turn this spike into something more substantial for the sector – but unless I see that happening, I think this uranium development will either fizzle or create a spike that fades.

As such, if you really like the uranium space and watch it closely, buying a big producer (like Cameco) or a company with the ability to quickly start producing uranium in America (like Uranium Energy Corporation) makes sense. In fact, the latter makes a lot of sense, especially if you are inclined to believe the Russia-US spat will grow. But if you decide to play, be ready to take profits because political moves can disappear as quickly as they appear!


In her letter, Resource Maven explains what she is buying and selling, and why. Maven has bought into several of the markets best - performing stocks well ahead of the curve. She regularly identifies exciting new exploration opportunities and manages the inherent risk by selling some into speculative gains. And the mine builder and operator stocks that form the basis of the portfolio give strong, ongoing leverage to the rising prices of gold and silver. She has your precious metal bases covered.

Recent Posts


Hi Gwen: I was going to write a couple of days ago because I had not received anything regarding my subscription, so was happy to receive this yesterday.

I guess it was sometime in 2017 when I first subscribed to the Maven Letter because I was very disappointed with where my _____ newsletter subscriptions were going. I have been very pleased with both the style and contents of the letter, it reflects my interest in the junior market. I was really pleased with your excellent piece in the last issue regarding PP's and "free trade dates". But, more than anything I thank you for the Premium Service. It is a service that is excellent. In the past year we have had a number of issues that have soared and others that have been just great. There has only been one that disappointed, but even on that one I managed to almost break even and still have the warrants. Many thanks for a job well done.


-B (September 2020)

"Gwen - I just analyzed our returns for the past month. We had a 36.7% return on our portfolio in one month! Thank you so much for your excellent, thoughtful and timely guidance. 12 of the 18 stocks in my portfolio were recommended by you. 4 were recommended by other MIF letter writers and 1 each by Eric Sprott and Rick Rule. Yes it was a good month for precious metals - Gold was up $50 and Silver $3.90 - but “our" portfolio performance more than doubled the 16% of the GDXJ"


-WJ (June 1, 2020)