Gold’s Up, Gold’s Down – Where is Gold Going Now?
Last week was a great one for gold. After an eight-week decline pulled the price back 11.5% to a closing low of $1,147.25 per oz. on Mar. 18th, gold jumped back to close above $1,200 on Mar. 26th.
The question everyone is asking now: where will it go from here?
The long answer is the gold is looking good in the short term based on US dollar weakness, US economic softening in general, the phenomenon that a long list of government bonds are offering negative yields, and geopolitical events. The fact that commercial futures traders have winnowed their short positions to very low levels adds extra support to a bullish short-term outlook for the yellow metal.
I'll go through each of those factors in turn.
Greenbacks and Gold
The easiest way for gold to gain would be for the US dollar to stop rallying. That, in turn, depends on a raft of US economic factors as well as global geopolitical events.
But there is good reason to believe the dollar's ascent will take a real breather here, if for no other reason than its run to date:
As my friend Brien Lundin put it: No tree grows to the sky, no market makes this kind of rise without a correction.
It looks like the correction has begun: the greenback slid more between Mar 15th and 25th than had for over a year. And there is real impetus driving the dollar down.
If America wants its economy to keep growing, a weaker dollar would help. The dollar's strength is strangling exports, capping international profit margins, and generally making life hard for US companies.
The dollar has been climbing because (1) it is the safest of the main global currencies and (2) the US economy has been doing well, which supports the dollar in a world where other economies are struggling and governments injecting liquidity and providing interest rate support.
Point (1) is still true, though increasing worries of a US stock market crash are limiting the dollar's safe haven status. Point (2) is more contentious every day: as Fed Chair Janet Yellen said, "Growth has moderated somewhat."
The US Economy…
The data are mixed. There are a record number of job openings but labor force participation remains low, largely because employers seem to be demanding skills that job seekers don't have. As a consequence of this and other factors, wage growth has been very weak. With paycheques stubbornly refusing to rise, workers are spending less, borrowing less money, and definitely investing less.
Or even taking their money out. Bank of America Merrill Lynch calculates US stocks have seen $44 billion in outflows year-to-date, the worst start to a year since 2009. Several factors are driving the move away from stocks, including investors applying caution to overly bullish portfolios, the stream of weaker-than-expected economic data, and the strong dollar.
The latter two forces – a slowing economy and a strong dollar – have investors worried about their investments' bottom lines. As Bank of America put it, a "restoration of earnings-per-share confidence" is "needed for US inflows". In other words, investors aren't going to head back to the US markets in force without a solid showing of good Q1 earnings reports…which may not materialize.
The Commerce Department just released its revised estimates for the fourth quarter of 2014. The report said profits at US corporations posted their largest drop in four years in Q4. The Department also pegged corporate profit growth at 2.9%, slowing from 5.1% annual growth in the third quarter, and measurements of underlying demand in the economy showed weakness, with final sales of domestic product growing at just 2.3% versus 5% in the previous quarter.
Bonds Turned Bad?
Amidst all that are bonds. The list of countries offering negative yield bonds (with maturities at least a year, but in many cases several years) currently stands at nine: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland. Bonds from another six countries – Italy, Japan, Czech Republic, Hong Kong, Ireland, and Spain – are essentially offering zero yield. Late last week Rick Rule estimated the value of sovereign bonds offering negative yields at $4 trillion.
This is where gold gets some solid support. Until bond yields turned negative, investors continued in the 'normal' assumption that bonds offered a better return than gold. The rationale was twofold: the price of gold had been unstable and gold carries holding costs, whereas bonds offer reliable returns with no holding cost.
Now those reliable returns are gone, replaced by negative yields – the new 'holding cost' of owning government debt. Bonds have become much less attractive than gold. Combine that with economic uncertainty and you have good reason to see gold hold or gain ground, especially once you add in geopolitics.
Proxy War in Yemen
Yes, gold's rise last week was partly in response to the battle brewing in Yemen, which could turn into a full-on proxy war between the powers that be in the Middle East.
Yemen has been increasingly unstable since Shiite fighters from the north known as Houthis seized control of the capital, Sana, in January. It was the culmination of years of pressure. The Houthi waged a long insurgency against previous president Ali Abdullah Saleh, who agreed to step down in 2011. Now, four years later, the Houthi are working with security forces previously loyal to Mr Saleh to force his successor, Abdu Rabbu Mansour Hadi, first into hiding and then out of the country. The Houthi now control most of the Yemeni military, including its aircraft.
Civil war is terrible. Proxy wars are even worse. Unfortunately, Yemen increasingly resembles the latter.
Saudi Arabia shares a long border with Yemen. The Saudi royal family support Yemen's official government and oppose the Houthi, mainly because the Saudi royals are Sunni and Yemen's government had been Sunni, even though the population of Yemen is actually split between Sunni and Shia. The Houthis, by contrast, are Shia.
Now place that into the bigger picture. Iran is Shia, which is why Iran is backing the Houthi financially and militarily. Saudi Arabia is now bombing Yemen in response to Houthi control and Iranian involvement.
The Sunni-Shia divide has always been the main reason Saudi Arabia and Iran don't get along and Yemen is the new proxy battleground. Citizens are, unfortunately, the main casualties.
Supporting Saudi Arabia in this aggression: Egypt, United Arab Emirate, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Jordan, Sudan, Morocco, and now Pakistan.
Why all this support? Because Iran has been aggravating its neighbours lately: its backing of president Bashar al-Assad in Syria has been critical in extending the war there, its provocations have inflamed the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, and its leaders are currently in talk with US president Obama over having arduous sanctions lifted in exchange for giving up its nuclear weapons, a feat Obama desperately wants to claim and Iran equally wants to trumpet.
Faced with Iran's building clout, the players in the region are focusing on Yemen as a way to stifle Iranian influence. Adding adrenaline to the issue is that Yemen sits on the Bab al-Mandab strait, on of the world's oil transit chokeholds. Bab al-Mandab links the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden; 3.8 million barrels of oil pass through it every day on their way to world markets. That represents 7% of the world's seaborne oil trade and 4% of global daily oil demand.
Cue international interest. If it threatens global oil supplies, a geopolitical event is bestowed with reams of significance. In response to Saudi bombing Yemen oil prices climbed (even though the world is awash in oil right now) and gold gained – safe haven status in full effect.
What are the Speculators Saying?
Finally, what can we glean about gold from the speculators? The Commitment of Traders report tracks trading in gold futures – in other words, how the gold gamblers are betting.
The gamblers are divided into categories: large speculators, small speculators, and commercial traders. People like to obsess over the speculators, but it's really the commercial traders who matter. These guys know the gold business inside and out. They are required to short the market to lock in some portion of their pricing, reducing risk. But they reduce their short positions when they see gold nearing a bottom – and commercial gold short positions are currently very low.
Both charts show the last year. On the upper chart the blue bars show cumulative bets by speculators that gold will go up (long bets minus short bets); the maroon bars show cumulative bets by commercial traders that gold will go down. The longer/more negative the maroon bars, the more commercial bets have been placed on a gold price slide.
Notice that the gold price basically mirrors the commercials positions chart: as the orange circles highlight, when commercial short positions are at their lowest, gold is generally at a bottom.
Commercial short positions are pretty low right now. That bodes well for gold in the short term.
Gold lost a bit of ground today, which is no great surprise. This is a big week for economic data, so after gold's gains last week traders are likely being cautious before the data starts to flow.
As long as US data doesn't include lots of surprises on the upside (which have been absent for some time), I would bet the dollar trades sideways, US markets slide slightly, and gold ends the week up. China and the Eurozone are also releasing economic data; strength from either would help gold and is possible from Europe, which has been surprising to upside regularly.
I see gold staging another surge before settling back for the summer and, after last week, I think that surge is now.
Then again, I could be completely wrong.
have been investing in the precious metals space for about 20 years so I am more comfortable using your geological knowledge as a guide for my portfolio but when it comes to uranium that is an entirely new field where I am not as familiar with grades, jurisdiction value, etc. so I prefer some stability with the effort to play the market. Your reply offered just that!
Hi Gwen: I was going to write a couple of days ago because I had not received anything regarding my subscription, so was happy to receive this yesterday.
I guess it was sometime in 2017 when I first subscribed to the Maven Letter because I was very disappointed with where my _____ newsletter subscriptions were going. I have been very pleased with both the style and contents of the letter, it reflects my interest in the junior market. I was really pleased with your excellent piece in the last issue regarding PP's and "free trade dates". But, more than anything I thank you for the Premium Service. It is a service that is excellent. In the past year we have had a number of issues that have soared and others that have been just great. There has only been one that disappointed, but even on that one I managed to almost break even and still have the warrants. Many thanks for a job well done.