I cannot stop. Reading, talking, questioning, researching – the markets are so up and down, excitable and depressive, liquid and illiquid.
There are so many questions, each with such a range of answers.
Is the end of quantitative easing in the United States significant? Did the greatest financial experiment in the modern world work? How long will Japan's surprise move into QE fuel global markets? Is Europe sliding into recession and/or deflation? How high can the greenback go? Where and when will gold bottom? Why is silver always so confusing? Will the Fed raise interest rates? When will supply constraints start driving metals back up? Is cheap oil a good thing?
The list of questions goes on. None are easy and all are interrelated. Thinking it all through feels like a Choose Your Own Adventure book, full of binary decisions that dictate what will happen.
For example, if I decide that the US recovery is real and markets have already accounted for the end of QE, it follows that the greenback will continue to strengthen and gold decline while North American equities trend upwards.
But wait a minute. Major indices are up 200% in just over five years. The S&P is trading at almost 18 times earnings, compared to an historic average of 16
times. Can corporate earnings rise fast enough to justify that multiple? Seems unlikely, especially given that large US companies generate a lot of their sales outside the country – 30% of sales by S&P 500 companies are international, for example – and key international buyers (Europe, Japan) are struggling. Plus, a stronger dollar will make those exports a harder, more expensive sell.
Adding to that, QE's main effect was to support equity and bond issuers. While the Fed was printing money, there was no chance of higher interest rates. Low interest rates make long-term assets more valuable, because discount rates are reduced. Low rates also discourage portfolio managers from holding cash; instead they put their dollars into equities and bonds representing long-term assets. That action bids up prices and encourages more of the same.
As more follow this path, valuations rise and the moves seem smart, building momentum. The result: certainty of low interest rates means higher equity valuations and better bond markets, both of which encourage spending.
Now that encouragement is gone: QE is over and there is no knowing when the Fed might raise interest rates. That makes an ever-ascending market seem less and less likely.
Then there's gold, priced such that a third of production is already uneconomic. Curtailments are around the corner. As production falls off, supply will fail to meet demand and the price will have to rise.
Maybe I should have chosen the other adventure?
Bottom line: it is very hard to assemble a comprehensive picture of what has happened, is happening, and will happen.
That doesn't stop me from having a few predictions.
The most important one is this: whatever happens in the next month, metals and miners are at a bottom in a broad sense. For investors positioning to capture the sector's next cycle, the broad-sense bottom is all that matters.
Gold will fall farther in the coming weeks. For one, tax loss selling is just getting underway in earnest, which will put added pressure on a beat-up junior market.
More generally, for now the US economy seems to have momentum. While that persists, aided by cheap oil, the greenback will keep rising. Gold usually opposes the dollar, so a strengthening dollar is bad for gold.
Where will it bottom? Forecasts range from $1,100 to $700 per oz.
I don't care to pick a bottom. What I will say is that the price of gold cannot stay below $1,000 for long before production starts to dry up in a significant way.
Gold also has support. China has been buying gold like mad of late (see Koos Jansen's latest article on China's insatiable gold appetite for details). India is also buying significantly. Russia too – Putin bought 37 tonnes of gold in September to lift Russia's stockpile to its highest level since 1993.
Similar arguments can be made for silver, copper, and nickel. For uranium too, though the timeframe there is longer, and for iron ore and metallurgical coal.
It comes down to this: metals are primed for a real rebound, one based on prices, supply, and demand. It will not start tomorrow. When it does start, it will at first feel very slow.
But it will happen. China is preparing a massive infrastructure program, one designed to move 250 million people into cities and turn them into consumers. That program will generate enough copper demand alone to catalyze a mining rebound. India, Mexico, and perhaps the resurgent US will add to demand, along with others.
Metal supply and demand are very real. While the rest of the market went on a spectacular run over the last four years, metals and miners wallowed in a brutal slump because demand did not rise, prices fell, and costs climbed.
Going forward I see the disjoint continuing. The Dow Jones, the S&P, the NASDAQ – they might correct or they might continue upwards. That will depend on the price of oil, whether Europe embarks on more easing, the performance of the yen against the dollar and the euro, housing starts, inflation assessments, jobs reports, even ebola.
Whichever happens will have some impact on mining stocks, but these equities are so low, so pummeled, that there is little room for further beating.
The world's biggest gold miners are trading at multi-year lows. Shares in Barrick, the biggest of the bunch, are worth just $13.54, down from $55 three years ago. ABX shares haven't been so cheap for more than a decade. Same goes for Kinross and IAMGOLD. Goldcorp, Yamana, and New Gold are trading at their 2008 lows.
This is what I mean by a bottom in a broad sense. Gold will fall somewhat farther in the coming weeks. These miners will likely fall with it. But in two or three years, when the metals rebound is in full force, it will matter not whether you bought at the precise bottom.
It will only matter than you bought.
To learn how to turn resource knowledge into investment success: subscribe to Resource Maven: The Turning Point.
EDITORIAL POLICY AND COPYRIGHT: Companies are selected based solely on merit; fees are not paid. This document is protected by copyright laws and may not be reproduced in any form for other than personal use without prior written consent from the publisher.
DISCLAIMER: The information in this publication is not intended to be, nor shall constitute, an offer to sell or solicit any offer to buy any security. The information presented on this website is subject to change without notice, and neither Resource Maven (Maven) nor its affiliates assume any responsibility to update this information. Maven is not registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser in any jurisdiction. Additionally, it is not intended to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in the material. Maven cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. Additionally, Maven in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned. Furthermore, Maven accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of our product, website, or other content. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions and should seek the advice of a qualified investment advisor and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Information and statistical data contained in this website were obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable. However, Maven does not represent that any such information, opinion or statistical data is accurate or complete and should not be relied upon as such. This publication may provide addresses of, or contain hyperlinks to, Internet websites. Maven has not reviewed the Internet website of any third party and takes no responsibility for the contents thereof. Each such address or hyperlink is provided solely for the convenience and information of this website's users, and the content of linked third-party websites is not in any way incorporated into this website. Those who choose to access such third-party websites or follow such hyperlinks do so at their own risk. The publisher, owner, writer or their affiliates may own securities of or may have participated in the financings of some or all of the companies mentioned in this publication
In her letter, Resource Maven explains what she is buying and selling, and why. Maven has bought into several of the markets best - performing stocks well ahead of the curve. She regularly identifies exciting new exploration opportunities and manages the inherent risk by selling some into speculative gains. And the mine builder and operator stocks that form the basis of the portfolio give strong, ongoing leverage to the rising prices of gold and silver. She has your precious metal bases covered.
Thank you for the update. I am actually quite glad that you are flexible with your letters to enable you to get your readers the best information. And, I appreciate your offer to join the premium newsletter. I hope to continue to build my portfolio, with the help of your newsletter, to the point where I am able to take advantage of your offer and join the pp world in the not too distant future. I have really enjoyed your newsletter, read it with interest and have aligned my commodity portfolio with your recommendations, which has worked out very well. You are clearly a very trustworthy person, which is not always commone in the world of commodity investing. Thank yo for doing what you do so the small retail investor/speculator like me can have a better chance at success.
What distinguishes you from the rest is candor and honesty. You have a genuine concern for your subscribers that exceeds the other publishers I know. IMO that's more important than geological knowledge or even performance.