Base metals have been hit much harder, with copper down 6.5%, zinc down 6.4%, and nickel down 5.5% last week alone. Copper has in fact fallen for the last 12 straight sessions, which is its longest retreat in more than three decades.
So fear is having an effect.
Should fear matter? History says no, not to overall stock performance.
Putting ‘fear’ aside for a moment, let me consider the reality of what’s going on in China. Sixteen cities are on lockdown. Businesses are not operating, factories are suspended, travel is off limits. The city of Wuhan alone is home to 11 million people (for comparison, there are 8 million in New York City) and its streets are deserted.
That will have a real economic impact. China is responsible for more than 50% of world demand for base metals, so the near-completely suspension of almost 4% of its population will matter. And China’s manufacturing PMI has been hovering near 50 for years now, which means any negative momentum will likely push it into contraction territory (below 50).
|That said, it is only 4% of China’s population that’s on lockdown. And the lockdown is not likely to last that long (a month?). So while it will impact economic data, the impact won’t likely be dramatic. At this point, estimates are that Chinese GDP growth will be down 1.5% for the quarter – big but not huge.|
The thing is – the US markets and the Chinese economy are different beasts but they are similarly susceptible to this strain because both have been advancing on unconvincing engines for some time. When investors are confident in the engine, a bump in the road doesn’t matter…but when they aren’t convinced in the engine, bumps can become mountains.
The chart below is one example of where this weak economy bull market has led us: corporate CEOs have very little confidence in the setup, despite consumers remaining bullish. Such disparities have predicted previous recessions.
|Where does this all leave us? |
At the start of the year copper bulls had been getting excited that the red metal would soon start rising. Copper fell last year because of the trade war dampened growth expectations but its supply-demand fundamentals show that a stronger price is needed. That remains true but China’s Q1 setback has set the copper bull market back as well.
The coronavirus is stoking fear – of an epidemic, yes, but for this conversation it’s more importantly stoking fear that weak Chinese demand will be the camel that breaks the bull market’s back. I think this very unlikely but it is still a possibility.
Both of the kinds of fear listed above encourage investors to buy safe havens. Gold is benefitting.
Gold gaining on coronavirus is just like gold gaining on the threat of war between Iran and America. They are both what we call geopolitical pushes and such price moves usually unwind.
This time, though, I think context matters. Gold is not spiking in a vacuum; it is gaining out of a rising trend, which is supported by a long list of macroeconomic factors. In fact, investors have been buying gold to hedge the risk of a stock market correction or crash for some time now, so coronavirus gold buying is simply more of the same.
If gold really spikes in the next little while, don’t expect the spike to sustain. But because the macro arguments for gold are very strong, I think any spike correction will be just that, returning gold to its underlying upward trend.
If you would like a refresher on the macroeconomic fundamentals supporting gold, I went through precisely that in my presentation at the Metals Investor Forum a few weeks ago. To watch that 20-minute video click here or on the image below.